Monday, October 8, 2012
Thursday, October 4, 2012
RM2500 untuk sebuah tangki air plastik?
KUALA
LUMPUR, 14 OKTOBER: Harga tangki air plastik sehingga lima kali ganda
dari harga pasaran telah menimbulkan keraguan dan mengejutkan ramai
pihak dengan peruntukan RM100 juta oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan Barisan
Nasional dalam Belanjawan 2013 mereka untuk Sabah dan Sarawak bagi
menyediakan 40,000 tangki plastik untuk simpanan dan tadahan air rakyat
di kawasan pedalaman negeri tersebut.Menurut Ahli Parlimen Kota Kinabalu Dr. Hiew King Cheu, harga RM2,500 setiap sebuah tangki plastik adalah tidak masuk akal dan tidak boleh diterima.
“Dalam satu semakan yang dibuat untuk sebuah tangki yang hampir serupa dengan tangki 1Malaysia yang dibekalkan sebelum ini, kita dapati harga sebenarnya cuma sekitar RM500 sebuah. Jika ditambah dengan kos pengangkutan dan keuntungan, ia tidak akan semahal itu,”
Menurut beliau, kerajaan BN tanpa segan silu membuka pekung mereka sendiri kerana apa yang paling diperlukan penduduk di kampung dan kawasan pedalaman ialah bekalan air paip yang terawat bukannya tangki air plastik.
“Sampai sekarang, bekalan air terawat tidak boleh didapati walaupun rumah penduduk kampung mempunyai paip air. Kenapa ini boleh berlaku? Kenapa penduduk kampung terutamanya di Sabah ini dipinggirkan?” soalnya dalam kenyataan kepada media hari ini.
Katanya lagi, pemberian tangki plastik ini bukanlah satu penyelesaian masalah jangka panjang.
“Apa gunanya tangki tersebut dalam musim kemaru yang panjang atau lebih dari seminggu? Penduduk akan tetap menderita ketiadaan air,” ujar Dr. Hiew.
Dalam perkara yang sama, satu-satunya Ahli Parlimen DAP di Sabah itu berkata bahawa air yang ditakung dari air hujan tersebut tidaklah bersih dan biasanya menjadi tempat nyamuk bertelur.
“Kekotoran pada bumbung rumah juga boleh menyebabkan air takungan tersebut tercemar.” jelasnya lagi.
“Oleh yang demikian, perkara yang perlu diutamakan bukanlah tangki air plastik tetapi membekalkan bekalan air bersih terawatt kepada kawasan pedalaman untuk memastikan kesihatan penduduk terjamin.” – Roketkini.com
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Buying PRU13 - The Najib Way
Let's see what we have here. Succinctly put a budget which is best
described as "more of the same", without new directions in managing the
country's economy or creating new wealth including equitable
distribution.
It is a budget that is designed to buy and secure another five years for the BN. It's designed to help the regime tide over what has been described as the country's most fiercely fought polls by throwing money at poor households, civil servants and young people - all who are key in bolstering BN's vote bank and if possible give prime minister Najib Razak a larger mandate.
In the quest to stay in power, the government has forgotten the welfare of the people. Malaysian families are facing a cost of living crisis but the budget does not provide sustainable solutions to this pertinent problem.
Instead it offers a one-off solution through BRIM 2.0 or RM 500 in cash handouts to households earning RM3,000 and below. And throwing in RM 200 to youths to buy smart-phones is not going to solve the problem. The government needs to explain how giving RM 200 for purchasing smart phones is going to cushion society from spiraling prices. This shows that this budget is about buying and securing BN's interest given a large number of the 2.2 million newly registered voters are likely to vote against the government.
The RM3-4 billion could have been used to increase food production and provide affordable transportation. Increase in food production could lead to lower food prices, greater income for rural and suburban farmers while saving money from foreign imports. And affordable transportation linking the periphery to the core city centers would help to decrease transportation costs.
Increase in food production and affordable transportation would have gone a long way to help manage the increase in the cost of living. But we have missed yet another chance.
However the puzzling ways of the government do not stop here. For example, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is getting a RM276 million-allocation to fight graft. No this has nothing to do with looking at restructuring the body which has come under severe criticism for lopsided investigations and targeting only opposition politicians. Instead, the government will make available an additional 150 posts annually to reach a target of 5,000 personnel in the MACC.
And that's still not the end of the horror for it has made available RM300 million for 1.5 million young people to buy smartphones from an authorized dealer. While this deal smacks of cronyism, it also shows Najib's priority or shall we say the lack of it, given the case.
While a desperate Najib slammed the opposition and took pot shots at Anwar Ibrahim during the last half hour of his budget speech last Friday, without mentioning names of course, he chose to give a rosy economic projection for the country. But growth rate projections of 4.5 % - 5% are highly optimistic. Malaysia is an open economy and thus highly vulnerable to external shocks.
The Ministry of Finance's Economic Report (2012-2013) notes that the country has experienced a 35-percent drop in FDI in the first 6 months of 2012. In fact, the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) most recent World Economic Outlook warns developing nations to brace for further risks from uncertainties in Europe and the USA.
This together with the contagion impact on the Indian and Chinese economies will bite into Malaysia's growth for the coming year. A further problem for the Malaysian economy would be the impact of the euro-zone crisis on demand for palm oil and other commodities. Industry sources note that palm oil prices would drop further in the coming months impacting on the country's revenue stream.
Let's not forget that 40% of Malaysia's revenue comes from the oil and gas sector which is very vulnerable to oil price fluctuations and production.
Deficits and debts have become BN's preferred policy norm or option in economic management. The government's attempts in reducing its 15-year budget deficit to 4%, from about 4.7 per cent of GDP in 2012, is largely prompted by pressure from global fund managers and rating agencies.
In the recent months, agencies such as Fitch and S&P warned of credit rating downgrades if the government did not reign in its fiscal deficit and ballooning debt of RM502.4 billion or 53.7% of GDP this year, with federal debt level at 55% of GDP being the legislated debt ceiling.
The government argues that deficit would be reduced with efficient tax collection and higher economic growth projected at 4.5% - 5.5% for 2013. This is also unlikely given the euro-zone crisis and its contagion impact on China and India. Thus projected increase in taxes and growth rates might not materialize.
And no where in Najib's two-hour budget speech did we hear anything about reducing wasteful spending like reducing the country's civil service, a move which is necessary but will create a backlash for his government come the next general election.
So one can expect a supplementary budget in 2013 just like the RM 13.8 billion a few months ago. What is clear is that the long term strategy in managing public finances in a sustainable fashion is missing.
Crime is another pressing problem in the country. While we commend the government for responding to the crime-issues faced by the rakyat, the present strategy of buying hardware and increasing manpower in the police force are not going to solve the problem. What is urgently required is a strategy change and re-allocation of resources.
The purchase of 1000 motor bikes is not going to decrease crime nor create confidence in the police force. The installation of 496 CCTV in 25 local councils is not going to create an iota of confidence in the police force either, especially if the nexus between the police and criminals and corruption are not addressed.
Instead the crucial action which needs to be taken immediately is the re-deployment of police personnel from non-crime related departments to crime related departments of the force.
At present about only 14% of the uniformed police force is in crime-related departments (criminal investigation department, narcotics and commercial crime investigation). In direct contrast, 86% of police personnel belong to the non-crime related sectors (management, internal security and public order, logistics, special branch, and special task force). And more financial resources should be allocated to the criminal investigation department which receives about 8% over the last three years.
Malaysia aims to become a high income, fully developed country by 2020. And yet, the prime minister and his government are reluctant to make the shift from race-based policies to merit and need and rights based policies. The has caused a massive brain drain and proved deterrent in luring foreign talent.
In all, it's clear that Najib's budget is tailored to ensure the survival of a regime. While the premier has been generous in dishing out cash handouts, he has been silent on structural reforms.
Najib is focused on winning the next election and has used the budget to try and make this happen. But the long term benefits of his budget to the country and his people could be written at the back of a match box.
And Najib is not serious about reigning in the ballooning federal debt, reducing deficit, ensuring a healthy economy, weeding out graft, breaking the monopoly of cronies close to the ruling elite and looking seriously into issues confronted by the rakyat, for he has certainly failed to do these in his budget.
It is a budget that is designed to buy and secure another five years for the BN. It's designed to help the regime tide over what has been described as the country's most fiercely fought polls by throwing money at poor households, civil servants and young people - all who are key in bolstering BN's vote bank and if possible give prime minister Najib Razak a larger mandate.
In the quest to stay in power, the government has forgotten the welfare of the people. Malaysian families are facing a cost of living crisis but the budget does not provide sustainable solutions to this pertinent problem.
Instead it offers a one-off solution through BRIM 2.0 or RM 500 in cash handouts to households earning RM3,000 and below. And throwing in RM 200 to youths to buy smart-phones is not going to solve the problem. The government needs to explain how giving RM 200 for purchasing smart phones is going to cushion society from spiraling prices. This shows that this budget is about buying and securing BN's interest given a large number of the 2.2 million newly registered voters are likely to vote against the government.
The RM3-4 billion could have been used to increase food production and provide affordable transportation. Increase in food production could lead to lower food prices, greater income for rural and suburban farmers while saving money from foreign imports. And affordable transportation linking the periphery to the core city centers would help to decrease transportation costs.
Increase in food production and affordable transportation would have gone a long way to help manage the increase in the cost of living. But we have missed yet another chance.
However the puzzling ways of the government do not stop here. For example, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is getting a RM276 million-allocation to fight graft. No this has nothing to do with looking at restructuring the body which has come under severe criticism for lopsided investigations and targeting only opposition politicians. Instead, the government will make available an additional 150 posts annually to reach a target of 5,000 personnel in the MACC.
And that's still not the end of the horror for it has made available RM300 million for 1.5 million young people to buy smartphones from an authorized dealer. While this deal smacks of cronyism, it also shows Najib's priority or shall we say the lack of it, given the case.
While a desperate Najib slammed the opposition and took pot shots at Anwar Ibrahim during the last half hour of his budget speech last Friday, without mentioning names of course, he chose to give a rosy economic projection for the country. But growth rate projections of 4.5 % - 5% are highly optimistic. Malaysia is an open economy and thus highly vulnerable to external shocks.
The Ministry of Finance's Economic Report (2012-2013) notes that the country has experienced a 35-percent drop in FDI in the first 6 months of 2012. In fact, the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) most recent World Economic Outlook warns developing nations to brace for further risks from uncertainties in Europe and the USA.
This together with the contagion impact on the Indian and Chinese economies will bite into Malaysia's growth for the coming year. A further problem for the Malaysian economy would be the impact of the euro-zone crisis on demand for palm oil and other commodities. Industry sources note that palm oil prices would drop further in the coming months impacting on the country's revenue stream.
Let's not forget that 40% of Malaysia's revenue comes from the oil and gas sector which is very vulnerable to oil price fluctuations and production.
Deficits and debts have become BN's preferred policy norm or option in economic management. The government's attempts in reducing its 15-year budget deficit to 4%, from about 4.7 per cent of GDP in 2012, is largely prompted by pressure from global fund managers and rating agencies.
In the recent months, agencies such as Fitch and S&P warned of credit rating downgrades if the government did not reign in its fiscal deficit and ballooning debt of RM502.4 billion or 53.7% of GDP this year, with federal debt level at 55% of GDP being the legislated debt ceiling.
The government argues that deficit would be reduced with efficient tax collection and higher economic growth projected at 4.5% - 5.5% for 2013. This is also unlikely given the euro-zone crisis and its contagion impact on China and India. Thus projected increase in taxes and growth rates might not materialize.
And no where in Najib's two-hour budget speech did we hear anything about reducing wasteful spending like reducing the country's civil service, a move which is necessary but will create a backlash for his government come the next general election.
So one can expect a supplementary budget in 2013 just like the RM 13.8 billion a few months ago. What is clear is that the long term strategy in managing public finances in a sustainable fashion is missing.
Crime is another pressing problem in the country. While we commend the government for responding to the crime-issues faced by the rakyat, the present strategy of buying hardware and increasing manpower in the police force are not going to solve the problem. What is urgently required is a strategy change and re-allocation of resources.
The purchase of 1000 motor bikes is not going to decrease crime nor create confidence in the police force. The installation of 496 CCTV in 25 local councils is not going to create an iota of confidence in the police force either, especially if the nexus between the police and criminals and corruption are not addressed.
Instead the crucial action which needs to be taken immediately is the re-deployment of police personnel from non-crime related departments to crime related departments of the force.
At present about only 14% of the uniformed police force is in crime-related departments (criminal investigation department, narcotics and commercial crime investigation). In direct contrast, 86% of police personnel belong to the non-crime related sectors (management, internal security and public order, logistics, special branch, and special task force). And more financial resources should be allocated to the criminal investigation department which receives about 8% over the last three years.
Malaysia aims to become a high income, fully developed country by 2020. And yet, the prime minister and his government are reluctant to make the shift from race-based policies to merit and need and rights based policies. The has caused a massive brain drain and proved deterrent in luring foreign talent.
In all, it's clear that Najib's budget is tailored to ensure the survival of a regime. While the premier has been generous in dishing out cash handouts, he has been silent on structural reforms.
Najib is focused on winning the next election and has used the budget to try and make this happen. But the long term benefits of his budget to the country and his people could be written at the back of a match box.
And Najib is not serious about reigning in the ballooning federal debt, reducing deficit, ensuring a healthy economy, weeding out graft, breaking the monopoly of cronies close to the ruling elite and looking seriously into issues confronted by the rakyat, for he has certainly failed to do these in his budget.
Monday, October 1, 2012
Di manakah bakal Menteri Besar dan Kabinet Bayangan BN di 4 Negeri PR?
Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak sepatutnya mengamalkan
apa yang beliau katakan dan jangan berat sebelah dengan mengarahkan BN
di Kedah, Kelantan, Pulau Pinang dan Selangor untuk membentangkan EXCO
bayangan sekiranya BN bersungguh mahu menawan kembali negeri-negeri
tersebut. Maka BN sebenarnya lebih teruk daripada PR kerana BN bukan
sahaja tidak mempunyai kabinet bayangan untuk negeri-negeri PR tetapi
juga tidak melantik calon Menteri Besar di Selangor, Kelantan dan Kedah.
Sungguhpun BN berbohong bahawa PR tiada bakal Perdana Menteri, PR telah pun bersepakat dan bersetuju bahawa Perdana Menteri Malaysia yang seterusnya adalah Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. PR juga telah menggunakan pendekatan unik untuk kabinet bayangan dengan melantik 3 orang daripada setiap parti PR (PAS, DAP dan PKR) bagi setiap portfolio kementerian. Ini menunjukkan yang pemimpin PR bukan gilakan kuasa tetapi dahagakan dasar yang bermanfaat buat rakyat. Itu adalah budaya politik baru oleh PR dengan dasar berkesan berpaksikan rakyat berbeza dengan dasar memuja tokoh BN yang mengkayakan kroni.
DAP sesungguhnya tidak bersetuju bahawa penghapusan tol akan menyebabkan kejatuhan Bursa Malaysia kerana kebanyakkan pemegang konsesi adalah syarikat tersenarai awam. Sekali lagi Najib telah mendedahkan secara bawah sedar bahawa beliau lebih bimbangkan tentang nasib sebahagian kecil syarikat tersenarai awam berbanding mata pencarian 28 juta rakyat Malaysia.
Perdana Menteri mengancam bahawa penghapusan tol seperti Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan akan menyebabkan kejatuhan Bursa adalah salah sama sekali. Bagaimanakah Bursa mampu jatuh apabila PLUS telah pun diambil swasta tahun lepas dan tidak tersenarai pun di dalam Bursa Malaysia? Jelas ancaman sedemikian bukan sahaja mengarut tetapi juga tidak bertanggung jawab lebih-lebih lagi ia datang daripada seorang Perdana Menteri.
Sungguhpun BN berbohong bahawa PR tiada bakal Perdana Menteri, PR telah pun bersepakat dan bersetuju bahawa Perdana Menteri Malaysia yang seterusnya adalah Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. PR juga telah menggunakan pendekatan unik untuk kabinet bayangan dengan melantik 3 orang daripada setiap parti PR (PAS, DAP dan PKR) bagi setiap portfolio kementerian. Ini menunjukkan yang pemimpin PR bukan gilakan kuasa tetapi dahagakan dasar yang bermanfaat buat rakyat. Itu adalah budaya politik baru oleh PR dengan dasar berkesan berpaksikan rakyat berbeza dengan dasar memuja tokoh BN yang mengkayakan kroni.
DAP sesungguhnya tidak bersetuju bahawa penghapusan tol akan menyebabkan kejatuhan Bursa Malaysia kerana kebanyakkan pemegang konsesi adalah syarikat tersenarai awam. Sekali lagi Najib telah mendedahkan secara bawah sedar bahawa beliau lebih bimbangkan tentang nasib sebahagian kecil syarikat tersenarai awam berbanding mata pencarian 28 juta rakyat Malaysia.
Perdana Menteri mengancam bahawa penghapusan tol seperti Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan akan menyebabkan kejatuhan Bursa adalah salah sama sekali. Bagaimanakah Bursa mampu jatuh apabila PLUS telah pun diambil swasta tahun lepas dan tidak tersenarai pun di dalam Bursa Malaysia? Jelas ancaman sedemikian bukan sahaja mengarut tetapi juga tidak bertanggung jawab lebih-lebih lagi ia datang daripada seorang Perdana Menteri.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)